Tesla denies suspension issue and accuses blogger of lying

The feud between Elon Musk agency Tesla Cars and a vehicle blogger has sparked an angry open letter from the corporation. The feud started on Wednesday when Edward Niedermeyer posted on his blog, the Daily Kanban, that even as investigating…

The feud between Elon Musk agency Tesla Cars and a vehicle blogger has sparked an angry open letter from the corporation.

The feud started on Wednesday when Edward Niedermeyer posted on his blog, the Daily Kanban, that even as investigating reviews of suspension breakage in Tesla’s Model S and X vehicles, he found something troubling. A poster in a Tesla Motors discussion board claimed the suspension in his 2013 Model S had failed. The automobile had 70,000 miles on it and was out of warranty, so Tesla seemingly advised the owner that the employer would not pay for his repairs. Numerous days later, Tesla contacted him and offered to pay for fifty percent of the repairs if he agreed to sign a Goodwill Settlement. The Agreement stipulated that Version S’s proprietor would preserve confidential information of the incident and the work required to repair The auto.
In his weblog, Niedermeyer claims that this Settlement is an attempt via Tesla to block the owner of the car from reporting damage and troubles with The auto to the Countrywide Dual carriageway Visitors Safety Management (NHTSA). The owner notified the NHTSA anyway and claimed that the Management is currently investigating Tesla’s suspension problems.
But on Thursday night, Tesla shot lower back with an open letter protesting the suspension systems in its motors and accusing Niedermeyer of fabricating the report. The letter even shows that Niedermeyer would possibly have finished it with winning huge by way of shorting Tesla stock.

The corporation provides that it became properly aware of the problematic suspension mentioned in Niedermeyer’s post; However, Tesla says The automobile owner didn’t tell the whole tale:


For The car, this is mentioned within the blog post about the previous day’s news… The suspension ball joint skilled very odd rust. We haven’t seen this on another car, suggesting a very unusual use case. The auto had over 70,000 miles on it, and its owner lives down the sort of long dust street that required two tow vehicles to retrieve The automobile. (One to get The auto to the Motorway and get it from the Motorway to the service middle.) while we were given The automobile, it became caked in dust Icas Network.

In line with Tesla, the NHTSA asked for additional statistics on its suspension systems on April 20. The Administration told Tesla that it wished no new statistics from the electric car maker in the subsequent weeks. It turned into not able to perceive any Safety troubles with The auto’s suspension.

However, a Wall Street Magazine report on Thursday afternoon includes the following assertion from the NHTSA:

NHTSA analyzes the potential suspension problem on the Tesla Model S and is in search of extra facts from car proprietors and the organization… NHTSA found out about Tesla’s troublesome nondisclosure agreement last month. The agency immediately knowledgeable Tesla that any language implying that clients should not contact the agency regarding safety concerns is unacceptable. NHTSA expects Tesla to eliminate this kind of language.

As for the Goodwill Settlement, Tesla calls it “preposterous” to claim that the Settlement prevents the owner from reporting troubles to the NHTSA. “The basic point is to make certain that Tesla doesn’t do an amazing deed, most effective to have that used against us in court for further advantage… We can look at this situation and will paintings with NHTSA to see if we can manage it otherwise. Still, one issue is clear: this Agreement never even comes close to mentioning NHTSA or the government, and it has not anything to do with trying to stop someone from communicating with NHTSA or the authorities about our vehicles.”

In his weblog, Niedermeyer also notes that different automobile failures documented in the Tesla Vehicles forums had been resolved with out-of-warranty paintings from Tesla accompanied by a comparable Goodwill Settlement. Tesla did not address the one’s issues in its Thursday night time letter.

Eventually, the organization accused Niedermeyer of fabricating his report, noting that he previously wrote a submit referred to as “Tesla Death Watch” in 2008. “We don’t understand if Mr. Niedermayer’s [sic] motivation is sincerely to set an international report for awl-grinding or whether he or his associates have something monetary to advantage via negatively affecting Tesla’s inventory rate. However, it’s miles critical to spotlight that there are Numerous billion dollars in short sale bets against Tesla,” the agency wrote. “Which means that there is a strong monetary incentive to substantially amplify minor issues and to create fake issues from complete fabric.”

This isn’t the first time Tesla has attacked an author with a poor opinion of Tesla. In 2013, the big apple Times wrote a scathing review of The automobile, faulting it for various battery issues. Elon Musk is known as the overview “faux” and pulled the logs for the electronic vehicle, mentioning which the idea the reviewer had made mistakes in judgment even as operating the Model S. weeks later, Tesla stated it misplaced “tens of millions” of dollars in canceled orders due to The New York Times review.

About the author

Related Posts